MeasureThat.net

Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.replace vs String.replace classic

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/107.0.0.0
Opera 107
Windows
Desktop
8 months ago
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 9100628.0 Ops/sec
String.includes 20649196.0 Ops/sec
String.match 5290786.0 Ops/sec
String.replace 6748448.0 Ops/sec
String.replace classic 12183250.0 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

  • String.includes

  • String.match

  • String.replace

  • String.replace classic

;