MeasureThat.net

Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.3 Safari/605.1.15
Safari 17
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Desktop
one year ago
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 15809490.0 Ops/sec
String.includes 23511974.0 Ops/sec
String.match 14130830.0 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
AخA
 
var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /Hello/;
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

     
    regex.test(string);

  • String.includes

     
    string.includes("Hello");

  • String.match

     
    string.match("Hello");