MeasureThat.net

Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/117.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/117.0.2045.36
Chrome 117
Windows
Desktop
one year ago
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 9098142.0 Ops/sec
String.includes 21646508.0 Ops/sec
String.match 5713196.0 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
AخA
 
var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /Hello/;
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

     
    regex.test(string);

  • String.includes

     
    string.includes("Hello");

  • String.match

     
    string.match("Hello");