Run results for: Native vs. Lodash ".find"

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/116.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 116

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 8 months ago

Test name	Executions per second
Native Array.find	267867.5 Ops/sec
Lodash _.find	263856.6 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

const getRandomChar = () => String.fromCharCode(Math.floor(Math.random() * 26) + 97);
const getRandomString = () => Array(Math.floor(Math.random() * 10) + 1).fill().map(getRandomChar).join('');

var values = Array(1000000).fill().map(getRandomString);
var valueToFind = values[650249];

Tests:

Native Array.find
const nativeFoundValue = values.find((val) => val === valueToFind);
Lodash _.find
const lodashFoundValue = _.find(values, (val) => val === valueToFind);

Run results for: Native vs. Lodash ".find"

Comparing the speed of the native JavaScript Array.find to Lodash _.find

Native Array.find

Lodash _.find