MeasureThat.net

Run results for: String.includes vs. multiple String.endsWith

If what you're looking for is expected to be at the end of a string, is it faster to test multiple known setups from the end of the string?

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 110
Mac OS X 10.15.7
Desktop
one year ago
Test name Executions per second
String.includes 15792320.0 Ops/sec
Multiple String.endsWith 6630187.0 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
AخA
 
var string = "This is a moderately-sized string that ends with Hello World!";
Tests:

  • String.includes

     
    string.includes("World");

  • Multiple String.endsWith

     
    string.endsWith("World") || string.endsWith("World!");