Run results for: JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign vs for-in loop safe performance

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 13; MT2111) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/111.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome Mobile 111

Operating system: Android

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
Using the spread operator	1430797.2 Ops/sec
Using Object.assign	2669425.2 Ops/sec
Using For-In loop	28788474.0 Ops/sec
Using For-In loop with hasOwnProperty	1404335.4 Ops/sec

Tests:

Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);
Using For-In loop
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = {} for (let key in firstObject) { finalObject[key] = firstObject[key]; } for (let key in secondObject) { finalObject[key] = secondObject[key]; }
Using For-In loop with hasOwnProperty
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = {} for (let key in firstObject) { if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(firstObject, key)) { finalObject[key] = firstObject[key]; } } for (let key in secondObject) { if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(secondObject, key)) { finalObject[key] = secondObject[key]; } }