Run results for: Immer vs shallow copy

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 8.1.0; SAMSUNG SM-T590 Build/M1AJQ) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/8.0 Chrome/63.0.3239.111 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 63

Operating system: Android 8.1.0

Device Platform: Tablet

Date tested: 5 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
immer	1266.4 Ops/sec
shallow copy	430.7 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/immer/dist/immer.umd.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = { items: {}, count: 0, keys: [] }

for (let index = 0; index < 100; index++) {
  data[index] = { id: index, name: `ITEM-${index}`, value: Math.random() }
  data.count++
  data.keys.push(index)
}

var NEW_ITEM_ID = data.count +1

var produce = immer.default

Tests:

immer
data = produce(data, draft => { draft.items[NEW_ITEM_ID] = { id: NEW_ITEM_ID, name: 'ITEM-NEW', value: 0 } draft.counter++ draft.keys.push(NEW_ITEM_ID) })
shallow copy
data = { ...data, items: { ...data.items, [NEW_ITEM_ID]: { id: NEW_ITEM_ID, name: 'ITEM-NEW', value: 0 } }, count: data.count +1, keys: [ ...data.keys, NEW_ITEM_ID] }