Run results for: Template vs string concat 2

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 110

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
Concatenation	267.6 Ops/sec
Template strings	322.1 Ops/sec
Concatenating strings with template strings	293.5 Ops/sec
Concatenation without substring call	326.5 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {0:"test",1:"test",2:"test",3:"test"};

Tests:

Concatenation
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++){ let s = ""; for (let j = 0; j < 4; j++){ s += obj[j] + " - "; } s = s.substring(0,s.length - 3); }
Template strings
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++){ let s = `${obj[0]} - ${obj[1]} - ${obj[2]} - ${obj[3]}`; }
Concatenating strings with template strings
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++){ let s = ""; for (let j = 0; j < 2; j++){ s += obj[j] + " - "; } s += `${obj[2]} - `; s += `${obj[3]}`; }
Concatenation without substring call
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++){ let s = obj[0] + " - " + obj[1] + " - " + obj[2] + " - " + obj[3]; }