Run results for: array.includes vs set.has for small-ish n

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/109.0

Browser: Firefox 109

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
array includes	17704530.0 Ops/sec
set has	1747739000.0 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var a = Array.from({ length: 100 }, (_, i) => i)
var b = new Set(a)

Tests: