MeasureThat.net

Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 108
Mac OS X 10.14.6
Desktop
2 years ago
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 4101465.8 Ops/sec
String.includes 10423691.0 Ops/sec
String.match 2234930.2 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
AخA
 
var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /Hello/;
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

     
    regex.test(string);

  • String.includes

     
    string.includes("Hello");

  • String.match

     
    string.match("Hello");