Run results for: jQuery vs Vanilla JS SetText Speed Test (not slim)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 12; 2107113SG) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/106.0.5249.126 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/72.5.3767.69342

Browser: Opera Mobile 72

Operating system: Android

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
Pure JS .innerText	397835.4 Ops/sec
Pure JS .innerHTML	111014.5 Ops/sec
Pure JS .textContent	1379499.8 Ops/sec
jQuery .text()	190876.4 Ops/sec
jQuery .html()	47925.9 Ops/sec
jQuery .find().text()	138204.3 Ops/sec
jQuery .find().html()	36498.8 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.4.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>

Tests:

Pure JS .innerText
var el = document.getElementById("foo"); el.innerText = "New Hello World";
Pure JS .innerHTML
var el = document.getElementById("foo"); el.innerHTML = "New Hello World";
Pure JS .textContent
var el = document.getElementById("foo"); el.textContent = "New Hello World";
jQuery .text()
$("#foo").text("New Hello World");
jQuery .html()
$("#foo").html("New Hello World");
jQuery .find().text()
$(document).find("#foo").text("New Hello World");
jQuery .find().html()
$(document).find("#foo").html("New Hello World");

Run results for: jQuery vs Vanilla JS SetText Speed Test (not slim)

Pure JS .innerText

Pure JS .innerHTML

Pure JS .textContent

jQuery .text()

jQuery .html()

jQuery .find().text()

jQuery .find().html()