Run results for: Ramda pipe vs vanilla JS pipe (v2.0)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 107

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
Ramda pipe	1090161.0 Ops/sec
vanilla JS pipe	1255048.8 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.1/ramda.min.js" integrity="sha512-rZHvUXcc1zWKsxm7rJ8lVQuIr1oOmm7cShlvpV0gWf0RvbcJN6x96al/Rp2L2BI4a4ZkT2/YfVe/8YvB2UHzQw==" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = 2;

function funOne(data) {
  return data + data;
}

var funTwo = function funTwo(data) {
  return data * 2;
};

var flow = function flow(funcs) {
  return function () {
    for (var _len = arguments.length, args = new Array(_len), _key = 0; _key < _len; _key++) {
      args[_key] = arguments[_key];
    }

    return funcs.reduce(function (prev, fnc) {
      return [fnc.apply(void 0, prev)];
    }, args)[0];
  };
};

Tests:

Ramda pipe
R.pipe(funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo)(data)
vanilla JS pipe
flow([funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo, funOne, funTwo])(data)