Run results for: jQuery 3.3.1 selector vs jQuery 1.9.0 vs document.querySelector vs document.getElementById

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/56.0

Browser: Firefox 56

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.11

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 6 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
jQuery 3.3.1	1345116.0 Ops/sec
jQuery 1.9.0	1349118.0 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS querySelector	1919266.0 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS getElementById	2483256.0 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  var jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.0/jquery.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  var jq190 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div id="testElement"></div>

Tests:

jQuery 3.3.1
var el = jq331("#testElement")[0]; var className = el.className;
jQuery 1.9.0
var el = jq190("#testElement")[0]; var className = el.className;
Vanilla JS querySelector
var el = document.querySelector('#testElement'); var className = el.className;
Vanilla JS getElementById
var el = document.getElementById('testElement'); var className = el.className;

Run results for: jQuery 3.3.1 selector vs jQuery 1.9.0 vs document.querySelector vs document.getElementById

Comparing speed of jQuery 3.3.1 selector, jQuery 1.9.0, vanilla JS querySelector, and vanilla JS getElementById

jQuery 3.3.1

jQuery 1.9.0

Vanilla JS querySelector

Vanilla JS getElementById