Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes with array test

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/103.0.5060.134 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 103

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
RegEx.test	3534689.0 Ops/sec
String.includes	339019.4 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Hello world123!";
var regex = /(abc|bcd|cde|def|efg|fgh|ghi|hij|ijk|jkl|klm|lmn|mno|nop|opq|pqr|qrs|rst|stu|tuv|uvw|vwx|wxy|xyz|012|123|234|345|456|567|678|789)+/i;
var sequence = ["abc", "bcd", "cde", "def", "efg", "fgh", "ghi", "hij", "ijk", "jkl", "klm", "lmn", "mno", "nop", "opq", "pqr", "qrs", "rst", "stu", "tuv", "uvw", "vwx", "wxy", "xyz", "012", "123", "234", "345", "456", "567", "678", "789"]

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
sequence.some(word => string.toLowerCase().includes(word.toLowerCase()));