Run results for: Object.assign vs ES 6 Spread, multiple use cases

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/105.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 105

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
ES 6 Spread, combining objects	222209.4 Ops/sec
Object.assign, combining objects	1662207.0 Ops/sec
ES 6 Spread, cloning objects	14816180.0 Ops/sec
Object.assign, cloning objects	1184204.0 Ops/sec

Tests:

ES 6 Spread, combining objects
const a = { b: 'c', d: 'e', f: 'g' } const b = { c: 'd', e: 'f', g: 'h' } const c = { ...a, ...b }
Object.assign, combining objects
const a = { b: 'c', d: 'e', f: 'g' } const b = { c: 'd', e: 'f', g: 'h' } const c = Object.assign({}, a, b)
ES 6 Spread, cloning objects
const a = { b: 'c', d: 'e', f: 'g', g: 'h', i: 'j', j: 'k' } const b = { ...a }
Object.assign, cloning objects
const a = { b: 'c', d: 'e', f: 'g', g: 'h', i: 'j', j: 'k' } const b = Object.assign({}, a)