Run results for: Ramda vs. Lodash vs Natice (filter, find)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 15_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) CriOS/102.0.5005.87 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser: Chrome Mobile iOS 102

Operating system: iOS 15.4

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash filter	3259.5 Ops/sec
Ramda filter	3075.0 Ops/sec
Native filter	2348.1 Ops/sec
Lodash find	141359.8 Ops/sec
Ramda find	2653.0 Ops/sec
Native find	912637.4 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var fp = _.noConflict();

var data = _.range(10000).map(function(i) {
  return {counter: i}
});

function isOdd(num) {
  return num % 2 === 1;
}

Tests:

Lodash filter
var result = _.filter(data, isOdd);
Ramda filter
var result = R.filter(isOdd, data);
Native filter
var result = data.filter(({counter}) => isOdd(counter));
Lodash find
var result = _.find(data, {counter: 859});
Ramda find
var result = R.find(R.propEq('counter', 859), data);
Native find
var result = data.find(({counter}) => counter === 859);

Run results for: Ramda vs. Lodash vs Natice (filter, find)

Compares performance on the same tasks using Lodash vs Ramda vs Native.

Lodash filter

Ramda filter

Native filter

Lodash find

Ramda find

Native find