Run results for: Ramda vs. Lodash vs Natice (filter, find)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/100.0

Browser: Firefox 100

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash filter	298.3 Ops/sec
Ramda filter	295.0 Ops/sec
Native filter	4666.3 Ops/sec
Lodash find	66022.5 Ops/sec
Ramda find	1708.4 Ops/sec
Native find	99432.7 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var fp = _.noConflict();

var data = _.range(10000).map(function(i) {
  return {counter: i}
});

function isOdd(num) {
  return num % 2 === 1;
}

Tests:

Lodash filter
var result = _.filter(data, isOdd);
Ramda filter
var result = R.filter(isOdd, data);
Native filter
var result = data.filter(({counter}) => isOdd(counter));
Lodash find
var result = _.find(data, {counter: 859});
Ramda find
var result = R.find(R.propEq('counter', 859), data);
Native find
var result = data.find(({counter}) => counter === 859);

Run results for: Ramda vs. Lodash vs Natice (filter, find)

Compares performance on the same tasks using Lodash vs Ramda vs Native.

Lodash filter

Ramda filter

Native filter

Lodash find

Ramda find

Native find