Run results for: Ramda vs. Lodash vs Natice (filter, find)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; JSN-L21) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/100.0.4896.127 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome Mobile 100

Operating system: Android

Device Platform: Mobile

Date tested: 2 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash filter	306.2 Ops/sec
Ramda filter	328.0 Ops/sec
Native filter	358.0 Ops/sec
Lodash find	50110.7 Ops/sec
Ramda find	2762.3 Ops/sec
Native find	217724.6 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var fp = _.noConflict();

var data = _.range(10000).map(function(i) {
  return {counter: i}
});

function isOdd(num) {
  return num % 2 === 1;
}

Tests:

Lodash filter
var result = _.filter(data, isOdd);
Ramda filter
var result = R.filter(isOdd, data);
Native filter
var result = data.filter(({counter}) => isOdd(counter));
Lodash find
var result = _.find(data, {counter: 859});
Ramda find
var result = R.find(R.propEq('counter', 859), data);
Native find
var result = data.find(({counter}) => counter === 859);

Run results for: Ramda vs. Lodash vs Natice (filter, find)

Compares performance on the same tasks using Lodash vs Ramda vs Native.

Lodash filter

Ramda filter

Native filter

Lodash find

Ramda find

Native find