Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match (case insensitive)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.3 Safari/605.1.15

Browser: Safari 15

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
RegEx.test	9351127.0 Ops/sec
String.includes	2980864.0 Ops/sec
String.match	7598825.0 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an Unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.";
var regex = /unknown/i;

Tests:

RegEx.test
regex.test(string);
String.includes
string.toLowerCase().includes("unknown");
String.match
string.match(regex);

Run results for: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match (case insensitive)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match (case insensitive)

RegEx.test

String.includes

String.match