Run results for: Temp obj or in check

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/54.0.2840.71 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 54

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.11.6

Device Platform: Other

Date tested: 8 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Empty object with short method	1023022.9 Ops/sec
Empty object with long method	1353595.6 Ops/sec
Full object with long method	987802.7 Ops/sec
Full object with short method	1141773.4 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var haystack = {};
var SIZE = 10000;
for (var i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) { haystack['a' + i] = i; }
var objA = {};
var objB = { haystack: haystack };
function get1(obj, key) { return (obj.haystack || {})[key] || -1; }
function get2(obj, key) { return (obj.haystack && key in obj.haystack) ? obj.haystack[key] : -1; }
function get3(obj, key) { return obj.haystack && obj.haystack[key] || -1; }
function randomKey() { return 'a' + Math.floor(Math.random() * SIZE); }

Tests:

Empty object with short method
get1(objA, randomKey());
Empty object with long method
get2(objA, randomKey());
Full object with short method
get1(objB, randomKey());
Full object with long method
get2(objB, randomKey());
Empty object with shorter method
get3(objA, randomKey());
Full object with shorter method
get3(objB, randomKey());

Run results for: Temp obj or in check

Is it faster to test if an object contains a sub-object before looking up keys on it, or substituting an empty object in a falsy check

Empty object with short method

Empty object with long method

Full object with short method

Full object with long method

Empty object with shorter method

Full object with shorter method