Run results for: set.has vs. array.includes performance

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.110 Safari/537.36 Edg/96.0.1054.62

Browser: Chrome 96

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
includes	819303488.0 Ops/sec
lookup	1538867.2 Ops/sec

Tests:

includes
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]; return a.includes(9)
lookup
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]; var b = new Set(a) return b.has(9)