Run results for: JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign vs only-null-checked for-in loop performance

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/94.0

Browser: Firefox 94

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Using the spread operator	7014306.5 Ops/sec
Using Object.assign	10264957.0 Ops/sec
Using For-In loop	21823030.0 Ops/sec
Using For-In loop with type checks	21524162.0 Ops/sec

Tests:

Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);
Using For-In loop
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = {} for (let key in firstObject) { finalObject[key] = firstObject[key]; } for (let key in secondObject) { finalObject[key] = secondObject[key]; }
Using For-In loop with type checks
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = {} if (firstObject != null) { for (let key in firstObject) { finalObject[key] = firstObject[key]; } } if (secondObject != null) { for (let key in secondObject) { finalObject[key] = secondObject[key]; } }