Run results for: Map .has() only vs .get() only

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/90.0.4430.229 Whale/2.10.123.42 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 90

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 3 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
.has()	487.3 Ops/sec
.get() only	488.6 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

function noop() {}
map = new Map();
keys = [];

for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
  const k = new Number(i);
  keys.push(k);
  if (k % 2 !== 0) map.set(k, i);
}

Tests:

.has()
keys.forEach(k=>{ if (map.has(k)) noop() })
.get() only
keys.forEach(k => { const v = map.get(k); if (v) noop(v); })

Run results for: Map .has() only vs .get() only

This is to compare the cost of this pattern ```if (map.has(key)) ``` v/s ```const v = map.get(key); if (v) func1(v);```

.has()

.get() only