Run results for: for vs foreach vs some vs for..of vs for cached length different arrays no break

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:86.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/86.0

Browser: Firefox 86

Operating system: Windows 8.1

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 3 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
for	1388.8 Ops/sec
for cached length	2315.9 Ops/sec
some	2844.9 Ops/sec
for..of	596.4 Ops/sec
foreach	1738.3 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var a = new Array(10000);

for(i=0; i<5000; i++){
    a[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}
a[5000] = 1488;
for(i=5001; i<10000; i++){
    a[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}

var b = new Array(10000);

for(i=0; i<5000; i++){
    b[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}
b[5000] = 1488;
for(i=5001; i<10000; i++){
    b[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}

var c = new Array(10000);

for(i=0; i<5000; i++){
    c[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}
c[5000] = 1488;
for(i=5001; i<10000; i++){
    c[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}

var d = new Array(10000);

for(i=0; i<5000; i++){
    d[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}
d[5000] = 1488;
for(i=5001; i<10000; i++){
    d[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}

var e = new Array(10000);

for(i=0; i<5000; i++){
    e[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}
e[5000] = 1488;
for(i=5001; i<10000; i++){
    e[i] = ([1e7]+-1e3+-4e3+-8e3+-1e11).replace(/[018]/g, c => (c ^ crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(1))[0] & 15 >> c / 4).toString(16));
}

Tests:

for
var ahas1488 = false; for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) { if (a[i] === 1488) ahas1488 = true; }
for cached length
var bhas1488 = false; for (var i = 0, l=b.length; i < l; ++i) { if (b[i] === 1488) bhas1488 = true; }
some
var chas1488 = c.some(function(i) { return i === 1488; });
for..of
var dhas1488 = false; for (var i of d) { if (i === 1488) dhas1488 = true; }
foreach
var ehas1488 = false; e.forEach(function(i) { if (i === 1488) ehas1488 = true; });

Run results for: for vs foreach vs some vs for..of vs for cached length different arrays no break

Compare loop performance

for

for cached length

some

for..of

foreach