Run results for: Template strings vs. String.concat, v2

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.82 Safari/537.36 Edg/89.0.774.50

Browser: Chrome 89

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 4 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Template string	1892898.2 Ops/sec
String.concat	1375742.9 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

const base = '1-2'
const separator = '-';
const suffix = 3;

function templateString() {
  return `${base}${separator}${suffix}`;
}

function stringConcat() {
  return base.concat(separator, suffix);
}

​x
 
const base = '1-2'const separator = '-';const suffix = 3;​function templateString() {  return `${base}${separator}${suffix}`;}​function stringConcat() {  return base.concat(separator, suffix);}

Tests:

Template string
templateString()
templateString()
String.concat
stringConcat()
stringConcat()