Run results for: Ramda(0.27.0) vs. Lodash(4.17.20) vs Natice (filter, find)

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/88.0.4324.151 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 88

Operating system: Linux

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 3 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash filter	218.9 Ops/sec
Ramda filter	258.3 Ops/sec
Native filter	514.6 Ops/sec
Lodash find	88895.0 Ops/sec
Ramda find	3011.7 Ops/sec
Native find	432817.5 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.20/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var fp = _.noConflict();

var data = _.range(10000).map(function(i) {
  return {counter: i}
});

function isOdd(num) {
  return num % 2 === 1;
}

Tests:

Lodash filter
var result = _.filter(data, isOdd);
Ramda filter
var result = R.filter(isOdd, data);
Native filter
var result = data.filter(({counter}) => isOdd(counter));
Lodash find
var result = _.find(data, {counter: 859});
Ramda find
var result = R.find(R.propEq('counter', 859), data);
Native find
var result = data.find(({counter}) => counter === 859);

Run results for: Ramda(0.27.0) vs. Lodash(4.17.20) vs Natice (filter, find)

Compares performance on the same tasks using Lodash vs Ramda vs Native.

Lodash filter

Ramda filter

Native filter

Lodash find

Ramda find

Native find