Run results for: Lodash inRange vs JS inRange

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/84.0

Browser: Firefox 84

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 3 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash inRange	3309947.0 Ops/sec
JS inRange	18243050.0 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var inRange = (num, rangeStart, rangeEnd = 0) => (rangeStart < num && num < rangeEnd) || (rangeEnd < num && num < rangeStart);

Tests:

Lodash inRange
_.inRange(5, 0, 50); _.inRange(500, 0, 50); _.inRange(500, 0, 500); _.inRange(445, 0, 450); _.inRange(25, 0, 150); _.inRange(0, 0, 5); _.inRange(1, 0, 1); _.inRange(2, 0, 2);
JS inRange
inRange(5, 0, 50); inRange(500, 0, 50); inRange(500, 0, 500); inRange(445, 0, 450); inRange(25, 0, 150); inRange(0, 0, 5); inRange(1, 0, 1); inRange(2, 0, 2);