Run results for: Concat vs push(...) for large arrays of arrays

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/81.0.4044.138 Safari/537.36 OPR/68.0.3618.125

Browser: Opera 68

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 4 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Control (for push)	486194.4 Ops/sec
Concat	256130.0 Ops/sec
Spread	321717.5 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

window.top.tests = {control:[], concat:[], spread:[]};
window.test = (new Array(10)).fill(null);
window.arrays = (new Array(10)).fill(null).map(_ => window.test);
window.cutoff = 5000;

Tests:

Control (for push)
window.top.tests.control = window.arrays.reduce((acc, arr) => { acc.push(...arr); return acc; }, []); if (window.top.tests.control.length > window.cutoff) { window.top.tests.control = []; console.log('reset control'); }
Concat
window.top.tests.concat = window.arrays.reduce((acc, arr) => acc.concat(arr), []); if (window.top.tests.concat.length > window.cutoff) { window.top.tests.concat = []; console.log('reset concat'); }
Spread
window.top.tests.spread = window.arrays.reduce((acc, arr) => [...acc, ...arr], []); if (window.top.tests.spread.length > window.cutoff) { window.top.tests.spread = []; console.log('reset spread'); }

Run results for: Concat vs push(...) for large arrays of arrays

Comparing the various ways to append to a large array

Control (for push)

Concat

Spread