Run results for: Lodash reduce vs native in for loop

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/81.0.4044.138 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 81

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 4 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Native reduce (in for loop)	61.8 Ops/sec
Lodash reduce (in for loop)	21.6 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var nbIterations = 100000 //100,000
var numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];

Tests:

Native reduce (in for loop)
for (let i = 0; i < nbIterations; i++) { numbers.reduce((sum, n) => sum + n, 0) }
Lodash reduce (in for loop)
for (let i = 0; i < nbIterations; i++) { _.reduce(numbers, (sum, n) => sum + n, 0) }