Benchmark: Array.prototype.filter vs Lodash filter 2

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="lodash.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var array = [...Array(100000)].map(() => ({
    label: Math.random().toString(36).replace(/[^a-z]+/g, '').substr(0, 10),
    value: Math.random().toString(36).replace(/[^a-z]+/g, '').substr(0, 10)
}))

Tests:

Array.prototype.filter
array.filter(n => n.label.includes('de'))
Lodash filter
_.filter(array,n => n.label.includes('de'))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.prototype.filter
Lodash filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/77.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 77 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array.prototype.filter	250.6 Ops/sec
Lodash filter	252.1 Ops/sec

Array.prototype.filter vs Lodash filter 2 (version: 0)

perf test with more than a contrived list

Comparing performance of: Array.prototype.filter vs Lodash filter

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array.prototype.filter

Lodash filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A