MeasureThat.net

 bignumber.js vs. big.js vs. decimal.js vs. Fraction.js (v2, with script links corrected fork without "toString") (version: 0)

- https://github.com/iriscouch/bigdecimal.js/tree/v0.6.1 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/bignumber.js/tree/v9.0.0 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/big.js/tree/v5.2.2 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/decimal.js/tree/v10.2.0 - https://github.com/infusion/Fraction.js/tree/v4.0.12

Comparing performance of: Native vs Native + toFixed vs decimal.js vs big.js vs bignumber.js vs bigdecimal.js vs Fraction.js

Created: 5 days ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Tests:

  • Native

  • Native + toFixed

  • decimal.js

  • big.js

  • bignumber.js

  • bigdecimal.js

  • Fraction.js

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    Native
    Native + toFixed
    decimal.js
    big.js
    bignumber.js
    bigdecimal.js
    Fraction.js

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.
Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics
Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 5 days ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/111.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 111 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
Native 1093633000.0 Ops/sec
Native + toFixed 10589010.0 Ops/sec
decimal.js 924758.7 Ops/sec
big.js 1616144.0 Ops/sec
bignumber.js 823793.9 Ops/sec
bigdecimal.js 166503.9 Ops/sec
Fraction.js 1721733.0 Ops/sec