Benchmark: concat/includes vs spread

Tests:

concat/includes
let a1 = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; const a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f']; if (!a1.includes(a2)) a1 = a1.concat(a2);
spread
let b1 = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; const b2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f']; b1 = [...b1, ...b2]

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

Test case name	Result
concat/includes
spread

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 110 on Windows

Test name	Executions per second
concat/includes	6902837.0 Ops/sec
spread	18448670.0 Ops/sec

concat/includes vs spread (version: 0)