Benchmark: number ass testing

HTML Preparation code:

<!--script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iriscouch/bigdecimal.js/v0.6.1/lib/bigdecimal.js"></script-->
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/bignumber.js/9.0.1/bignumber.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/big.js/6.0.3/big.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/decimal.js/10.2.1/decimal.min.js"></script>
<!--script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/infusion/Fraction.js/v4.0.12/fraction.min.js"></script-->

Tests:

parseint all number
var a = 9999; var b = 9999; (parseInt(a) + parseInt(b)).toString()
parseint all string
var a = '9999'; var b = '9999'; (parseInt(a) + parseInt(b)).toString()
native
var a = 9999; var b = 9999; (a+b).toString()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
parseint all number
parseint all string
native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.110 Safari/537.36 Edg/96.0.1054.62

Browser/OS: Chrome 96 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
parseint all number	3730898.0 Ops/sec
parseint all string	3640108.0 Ops/sec
native	141672500.0 Ops/sec

number ass testing (version: 0)

- https://github.com/MikeMcl/bignumber.js/tree/v9.0.0 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/big.js/tree/v5.2.2 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/decimal.js/tree/v10.2.0

Comparing performance of: parseint all number vs parseint all string vs native

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

parseint all number

parseint all string

native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A