Benchmark: Ramda lens path vs precompiled lens path

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function compileFn(source) {
  // eslint-disable-next-line no-eval
  return eval(`(function() {return ${source}})()`);
}

function compiledPathGetter(path) {
  return compileFn(/* typescript */ `function _getter (obj) {
    return obj.${path};
  }`);
}

function ramdaGetter(path) {
  const getter = R.view(R.lensPath(path.split('.')));
  
  return getter;
}

window.theme = { colors: { red: 'red' } };

window.getNestedColor = compiledPathGetter('colors.red');
window.getNestedColorRamda = ramdaGetter('colors.red');

Tests:

Precompiled
getNestedColor(theme);
Ramda
getNestedColorRamda(theme);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Precompiled
Ramda

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/95.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 95 on Ubuntu

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Precompiled	1944361000.0 Ops/sec
Ramda	3035105.0 Ops/sec

Ramda lens path vs precompiled lens path (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Precompiled vs Ramda

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Precompiled

Ramda

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A