Benchmark: benchmark-16666 - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="module">
    import dayjs from "https://cdn.skypack.dev/dayjs@1.10.7"
    import * as luxon from "https://cdn.skypack.dev/luxon@2.3.0"
    import { parseISO } from "https://cdn.skypack.dev/date-fns@v2.28.0"
    import moment from "https://cdn.skypack.dev/moment@2.29.1"
    window.dayjs = dayjs
    window.parseISO = parseISO
    window.moment = moment
    window.luxon = luxon
</script>

Script Preparation code:

window.ds = "2022-01-12T00:51:53.623839+00:00";

Tests:

datefns
parseISO(ds)
luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromISO(ds);
moment
moment(ds)
dayjs
dayjs(ds)
native
new Date(ds)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
datefns
luxon
moment
dayjs
native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.93 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 96 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
datefns	318354.4 Ops/sec
luxon	127786.3 Ops/sec
moment	57096.8 Ops/sec
dayjs	309123.6 Ops/sec
native	1577958.0 Ops/sec

benchmark-16666 (version: 7)

Comparing performance of: datefns vs luxon vs moment vs dayjs vs native

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

datefns

luxon

moment

dayjs

native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A