Benchmark: template literal vs toString 4

Script Preparation code:

var max = 10000; // 10,000 (10 Thousand)

var array2 = [];
var array3 = [];
var array = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= max; i++) {
    array.push(i);
}

Tests:

toString
for(i=0; i < array.length; i++) { array2.push('simple string ' + (i * 5).toString()); }
template literal
for(i=0; i < array.length; i++) { array3.push(`simple string ${i * 5}`); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
toString
template literal

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.71 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 97 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
toString	398.5 Ops/sec
template literal	360.4 Ops/sec

template literal vs toString 4 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: toString vs template literal

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

toString

template literal

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A