Benchmark: Set vs Filter for unique (small and large)

Script Preparation code:

var smlarray = Array.from({length: 40}, () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 140));
var lrgarray = Array.from({length: 4000}, () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 140));

Tests:

Set spread (small)
const fsml = [... new Set(smlarray)]
Array from set (small)
const lsml = Array.from(new Set(smlarray))
Set spread (large)
const flrg = [... new Set(lrgarray)]
Array from set (large)
const llrg = Array.from(new Set(lrgarray))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Set spread (small)
Array from set (small)
Set spread (large)
Array from set (large)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_6) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0.1 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 14 on Mac OS X 10.15.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Set spread (small)	163087.3 Ops/sec
Array from set (small)	135319.8 Ops/sec
Set spread (large)	2314.5 Ops/sec
Array from set (large)	2307.3 Ops/sec

Set vs Filter for unique (small and large) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Set spread (small) vs Array from set (small) vs Set spread (large) vs Array from set (large)

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Set spread (small)

Array from set (small)

Set spread (large)

Array from set (large)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A